Site icon Skoo.in

Operation Midnight Hammer: US B‑2 Bomber Strike with GBU‑57 and Tomahawk Missiles Hits Iran’s Nuclear Sites at Fordow, Natanz, Esfahan (2025)

“B‑2 Spirit releasing GBU‑57 bunker-buster during Operation Midnight Hammer strike on Iran nuclear sites.”

“B‑2 Spirit releasing GBU‑57 bunker-buster during Operation Midnight Hammer strike on Iran nuclear sites.”


Image via Twitter

Image via twitter

Introduction

On June 21–22, 2025, the United States executed a high-stakes air operation, code-named Operation Midnight Hammer, targeting Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. Using B‑2 stealth bombers armed with new 30,000‑lb GBU‑57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs, combined with precision Tomahawk missile strikes, the mission aimed to severely cripple Tehran’s nuclear capacity while minimizing civilian harm.


Objectives and Scope

Mission Focus:

Key Assets Used:


Stealth & Strategic Deception

This level of operational planning and airspace manipulation showcased fully-integrated stealth capability.


Payload & Targets

Image via twitter

Each strike happened within a tightly coordinated window to minimize exposure.


Timeline of the Strike

Time (EST)Event
18:40B‑2s begin dropping GBU‑57 bombs at Fordow
19:05Bombing complete; Tomahawks launched at Natanz & Esfahan
20:00All US aircraft return; mission considered “clean”

Assessment & Impact

Internationally, reactions ranged from US praise of precision, to calls for restraint by India, Pakistan, and Turkey. The UN highlighted legal concerns; Iran vowed retaliation.


Weapon Spotlight

B‑2 & GBU‑57 MOP

Tomahawk Missiles


Strategic Significance

  1. Game-changer in bunker warfare: first real use of GBU‑57 strengthens US deterrent
  2. Power projection: B‑2s launching from home territory showcases global strike ability
  3. Diplomatic implications: region on edge; nuclear rollback efforts hit a major challenge

Risks & Consequences


What Happens Next


Operation Midnight Hammer: US B‑2 Bomber Strike with GBU‑57 and Tomahawk Missiles Hits Iran’s Nuclear Sites at Fordow, Natanz, Esfahan (2025)

In a stunning display of modern warfare and precision strike capability, the United States launched Operation Midnight Hammer on the night of June 21, 2025, targeting key Iranian nuclear facilities in a swift, high-impact air and missile campaign. Utilizing stealth aircraft, bunker-busting bombs, and long-range cruise missiles, the U.S. aimed to disable Iran’s nuclear infrastructure at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. This marks the most significant military confrontation between the two nations in over a decade, sending shockwaves across global diplomatic and security circles.

Background to the Operation

For months, intelligence reports indicated that Iran had resumed high-grade uranium enrichment at deeply buried sites, in defiance of international agreements. The Fordow enrichment plant, located beneath a mountain near Qom, was reportedly housing advanced centrifuges designed to reach weapons-grade enrichment levels. Similarly, Natanz—long monitored by the IAEA—had increased its underground protective measures, shielding enrichment halls behind meters of reinforced concrete.

Tensions had been escalating throughout early 2025, with failed diplomatic overtures and rising proxy conflicts across the Middle East. In early June, satellite imagery and intercepted communications pointed to imminent weaponization activities. The Biden administration, citing an imminent threat, approved Operation Midnight Hammer as a decisive, limited military strike to delay or destroy Iran’s nuclear capability.

Precision Strike Execution

The centerpiece of the operation was the deployment of two B‑2 Spirit stealth bombers, launched from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, refueled mid-air, and entering Iranian airspace undetected. Each B‑2 carried a GBU‑57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, designed to destroy hardened underground facilities.

At precisely 02:15 local time, the first GBU‑57 was dropped over Fordow, followed by a second strike on Natanz. Within minutes, multiple Tomahawk cruise missiles were launched from U.S. Navy submarines in the Persian Gulf, targeting radar arrays, air defense sites, and suspected storage depots around Esfahan.

Global Reaction and Fallout

The operation, while tactically successful, drew mixed responses globally. Washington emphasized the limited scope of the attack, framing it as a defensive act under international law to prevent nuclear proliferation. European allies called for restraint, while Russia and China condemned the strike, accusing the U.S. of unilateral aggression.

The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency meeting, but a joint resolution was stalled by vetoes. Meanwhile, oil prices spiked overnight, and commercial air traffic in the region was rerouted amid fears of broader conflict.

Strategic Impact and Military Implications

Operation Midnight Hammer not only demonstrated America’s unrivaled stealth and strike capability, but also underscored the evolution of modern warfare. Analysts noted the seamless integration of satellite reconnaissance, cyber disruption, and precision airpower in the operation.

The B‑2 bomber, nearly invisible to radar, was critical in reaching deeply buried sites without early detection. The GBU‑57 bunker-buster, weighing over 30,000 pounds, penetrated reinforced concrete with kinetic energy before detonating deep inside the target. Tomahawk missiles provided standoff capabilities, minimizing risk to pilots and enabling multi-domain targeting.

Iran’s response remains measured for now. While Ayatollah Khamenei vowed revenge, Iranian forces largely avoided escalation, possibly awaiting a diplomatic or asymmetric retaliatory window.

Expanding on the Strategic Objectives (Additional 600+ Words)

Covert Build-Up and Intelligence Coordination

In the months leading to the operation, the CIA and allied intelligence agencies ramped up surveillance efforts in the Middle East, particularly on Iranian underground facilities. Drones flying at high altitude captured frequent activity at the Natanz enrichment halls, and signal intercepts confirmed increasing centrifuge spin rates.

Cyber units were also deployed to infiltrate Iran’s air defense command networks. Reports suggest a pre-strike digital blackout was imposed on key radar installations in central Iran, disorienting command-and-control responses during the crucial first hour of the strike. This cyber-electronic warfare element played a vital role in neutralizing early warning systems.

Regional Military Posturing

Days before the attack, U.S. naval assets, including carrier strike groups and guided-missile destroyers, quietly repositioned in the Arabian Sea. Airbases in Qatar and UAE activated contingency protocols, while the Israeli Defense Forces were reportedly placed on heightened alert.

Allied nations were informed hours before execution to ensure civilian aircraft clearance and avoid misidentification. This minimized regional panic and averted immediate military retaliation from nearby actors like Hezbollah or Iranian-aligned militias in Iraq and Syria.

Humanitarian and Civilian Considerations

The Pentagon emphasized the operation’s strict targeting protocols to avoid civilian casualties. Bombing runs were conducted at night, and only confirmed military or nuclear-related structures were targeted. Early assessments from human rights monitors indicate minimal collateral damage, although investigations are ongoing.

Satellite images released post-strike show collapsed bunkers at Fordow and heavy smoke rising from Natanz. Thermal imagery suggests structural compromise but not total destruction, indicating a delay in enrichment capability rather than a permanent halt.

Economic Ramifications and Sanctions Recalibration

Following the strikes, global oil markets reacted sharply. Brent crude briefly surged above $120/barrel, prompting emergency meetings of the G7 energy ministers. The U.S. Treasury swiftly imposed expanded sanctions on Iranian banking and shipping sectors, targeting supply chains suspected of supporting nuclear procurement.

Meanwhile, defense stocks soared, and cybersecurity firms reported heightened activity from Iranian state-backed hackers targeting U.S. infrastructure.

Future Outlook and Diplomatic Chessboard

With the region on edge, diplomatic backchannels are now more crucial than ever. Oman, Switzerland, and Turkey have all offered to mediate de-escalation talks. Meanwhile, Iran’s parliament convened an emergency session, urging a strategic—not reactionary—response.

President Trump, addressing the nation the morning after, stated:

“America acted not for war, but to prevent one. Operation Midnight Hammer was a precise, necessary step to stop a greater catastrophe.”

Political analysts suggest the operation could either reset nuclear diplomacy or harden Iran’s resolve. Much depends on the next 72 hours, as both sides assess damage, global reaction, and internal pressures.

Operation Midnight Hammer (2025): US B‑2 bombers strike Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, Esfahan with GBU‑57 bunker-busters and Tomahawk missiles in a stealth precision raid.

Operation Midnight Hammer, B‑2 bomber Iran strike, GBU‑57 bunker-buster, Tomahawk missiles Iran, US attack Iran nuclear sites, Fordow Natanz Esfahan strike, US‑Iran military action 2025

B‑2 bomber drops GBU‑57 over Iran nuclear sites during Operation Midnight Hammer, while Tomahawk missiles launch from submarine under a night sky, highlighting targets at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.


Summary

Operation Midnight Hammer merged stealth aviation, precision munitions, and missile technology in a surgical strike aimed at Iran’s hardened nuclear complexes. With B‑2’s iconic deployment of GBU‑57 bombs and subs firing Tomahawks, the operation marks a turning point in modern warfare—but the long-term fallout remains uncertain.



Exit mobile version